PAPER WASTES AS BEDDINGS IN VERMICOMPOST PRODUCTION

Tengku Arisyah Tengku Yasim-Anuar a, John Keen, Chubo b*, and Marina, Mohd. Top @ Mohd. Tahc
a Nextgreen Pulp and Paper Sdn Bhd, R&D Department, Menara LGB, Jalan Wan Kadir 1, Taman Tun Dr Ismail, 60000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
b Department of Forestry Science, Faculty of Agricultural Science and Forestry, Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus, 97000 Bintulu, Sarawak, Malaysia
c Department of Biology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia *Corresponding author: johnkeen@upm.edu.my

Received 31 st July 2021 ; accepted 4nd October 2021
Available online 20th December 2021

ABSTRACT. Paper waste is one of many wastes produced by men leading to more landfill spaces to dispose of them. Improper management of wastes can become a nuisance and can become a source of pollution and environmental degradation. This research aimed to determine the effect of different paper wastes (white paper, newspaper, and brown paper) as bedding materials on the efficiency of vermicomposting and nutrient content of the vermicompost. Vermicompost substrates (cow dung, vegetable waste and waste paper) were digested using earthworms (Eudrilus eugeniae) for up to 68 days and were assessed across physical (temperature and weight loss) and chemical parameters (pH, macro- and micro-nutrients content). The vermicompost gave pH values ranging from 7.9 to 9.9 for different paper beddings. The temperature in all vermicompost piles averaged 26 to 34˚C, while
weight losses were recorded at 26 to 38%. Chemical analyses of all vermicompost substrates showed no significant difference for N, P, Fe, Cu and Mg contents. In contrast, the C:N ratio, K, Na, Ca, Zn and Mn of the vermicompost products were significantly different (P<0.05). Although vermicomposting using newspaper bedding recorded the shortest period to mature with most nutrient contents suitable for application on plants, the Cu content was too high, suggesting that the amount of newspaper used as bedding should be reduced and substituted with other organic substances such as crop residues. Vermicomposting using paper wastes as beddings for earthworm (E. eugeniae) shows a good potential of producing vermicompost that can be used as a soil amendment.

KEYWORDS: paper wastes, beddings, Eudrilus eugeniae, vermicompost, nutrient content

Download Manuscript (Right-Click and Save As)

REFERENCES

  • Adamcová, D., Vaverková, M.D., Bartoň, S., Halivlíček, Z. & Břoušková, E. 2016. Soil contamination in landfills: a case study of a landfill in Czech Republic. Solid Earth, 7(1): 239- 247
  • Altemeier, M., Meyers, R. & Aviles, F. 2004. Size press filling boosts ash content enhances uncoated free-sheet quality. Pulp and Paper, 78: 52-54.
  • Barrena, R., Font, X., Gabarrell, X. & Sanchez, A. 2014. Home composting versus industrial composting: Influence of composting system on compost quality with focus on compost stability. Waste Management, 34(7): 1109-1116.
  • Basheer, M. & Agrawal, O.P. 2013. Management of paper waste by vermicomposting using epigeic earthworm, Eudrilus eugeniae in Gwalior India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 2(4): 42-47.
  • Bernal, M.P., Alburquerque, J.A. & Moral, R. 2008. Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment: A review. Bioresource Technology, 100(2): 5444- 5453.
  • Brady, N.C. & Weil, R.R. 2002. The Nature and Properties of Soils, 13th Edition. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall Publisher. Bray, R.H. and L.T. Kurtz, 1945. Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Science, 59: 39-46.
  • Campos, J.R., Dendooven, L., Bernal, D.A. & Ramos, S.M.C. 2014. Potential of earthworms to accelerate removal of organic contaminants from soil: A review. Applied Soil Ecology, 79: 10- 25.
  • Chen, Z., Yang, L., Liu, T., Jiang, J., Li, B., Cao, Y. & Yu, Y. 2013. Ecological effects of cow manure compost on soils contaminated by landfill leachate. Ecological Indicators, 32: 14-18.
  • Doan, T.T., Bouvier, C., Bettarel, Y., Bouvier, T., Tureaux, T.H., Janeau, J.L., Lamballe, P., Nguyen, B.V. & Jouquet, P. 2014. Influence of buffalo manure, compost, vermicompost and biochar amendments on bacterial and viral communities in soil and adjacent aquatic systems. Applied Soil Ecology, 73: 78-86.
  • Dominguez, J., Edwards, C.A. & Ashby, J. 2001. The biology and population dynamics of Eudrilus eugeniae (Kinberg) (Oligochaeta) in cattle waste solids. Pedobiologia, 45(4): 341-353.
  • Eghball, B. 2002. Soil properties as influenced by phosphorus- and nitrogen-based manure and compost applications. Agronomy Journal, 94(1):1 28–135.
  • Fornes, F., Mendoza-Hernandez, D., Garcia-de-la-Fuente, R., Abad, M. & Belda, R.M. 2012. Composting versus vermicomposting: A comparative study of organic matter evolution through straight and combined processes. Bioresource Technology, 118: 296-305.
  • Gutiérrez-Miceli, F.A., Santiago-Borraz, J., Molina, J.A.M., Nafate, C.C., Abud-Archila, M., Llaven, M.A.O., Rincón-Rosales, R. & Dendooven, L. 2007. Vermicompost as a soil supplement to improve growth, yield and fruit quality of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum). Bioresource Technology, 98(15): 2781 -2786.
  • Environmental Paper Network. 2018. The State of the Global Paper Industry 2018, available online: https://environmentalpaper.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/04/StateOfTheGlobalPaperIndustry20 18_ExecSummaryFinal.pdf. [Accessed July 2021].
  • Frederickson, J., Howell, G. & Hobson, A.W. 2007. Effect of pre-composting and vermicomposting on compost characteristics. European Journal of Soil Biology, 43(1): 320-326.
  • Guo, Y.H., Guo, J.J., Miao, H., Teng, L.J. & Huang, Z. 2014. Properties and paper sizing application of waterborne polyurethane emulsions synthesized with isophorone diisocyanate. Progress in Organic Coatings, 77(5): 988-996.
  • Hanc, A. & Chadimova, Z. 2014. Nutrient recovery from apple pomace waste by vermicomposting technology. Bioresource Technology, 168: 240-244.
  • Huang, K. & Xia, H. 2018. Role of earthworm’s mucus in vermicomposting system: Biodegradation tests based on humification and microbial activity. Science of the Total Environment, 610: 703- 708.
  • Jemal, K. & Abebe, A. 2020. Effect of different bedding materials and waste feeds on vermicompost production and local earthworm performance in Wondo Genet Ethiopia. Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research, 10(3): 13-18.
  • Khan, A. & Ishaq, F. 2011. Chemical nutrient analysis of different composts (vermicompost and pitcompost) and their effect on the growth of a vegetative crop Pisum sativum. Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research, 1(1): 116-130.
  • Khwairakpam, M. and Bhargava, R. 2009. Vermitechnology for sewage sludge recycling. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 161(2-3): 948-954.
  • Kumar, S, Tripathi, G & Mishra, G.V. 2021. A comparative study on agrowaste conversion into biofertilizer employing two earthworm species. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences9(2): 280-285.
  • Latifah, A.M., Mohd Lokman, C.J., Mohd Kamil, Y., Tengku Hanidza, T.I., Rosta, H. & Hafizan, J. 2009. Influences of bedding material in vermicomposting process. International Journal of Biology, 1(1): 81-91.
  • Lazcano, C., Gómez-Brandón, M. & Domínguez, J. 2008. Comparison of the effectiveness of composting and vermicomposting for the biological stabilization of cattle manure. Chemosphere, 72: 1013-1019.
  • Liu, F., Zhu, P. & Xue, J. 2012. Comparative study on physical and chemical characteristics of sludge vermicomposted by Eisenia fetida. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 16: 418-423.
  • Manaig, E.M. 2016. Vermicomposting efficiency and quality of vermicompost with different bedding materials and worm food sources as substrate. Research Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, 4(1): 1-13.
  • Martin-Gil, J., Navas-Gracia, L.M., Gómez-Sobrino, E., Correa-Guimares, A., Hernández-Navarro, S., Sánchez-Báscones, M. & Ramoz-Sánchez, M.D.C. 2007. Composting and vermicomposting experiences in the treatment and bioconversion of asphaltens from the prestige oil spill. Bioresource Technology, 99: 1821-1829.
  • Mehta, C.M., Palni, U., Franke-Whittle, I.H. & Sharma, A.K. 2013. Compost: Its role, mechanism and impact on reducing soil-borne plant diseases. Waste Management, 34(3): 607-622.
  • Munroe, G. 2014. Manual of on-farm vermicomposting and vermiculture, available online: http://www.organicagcentre.ca/DOCs/Vermiculture_FarmersManual_gm.pdf. [Accessed June 2018]. Nagavallemma, K. P., Wani, S. P., Lacroix, S., Padmaja, V.V., Vineela, C. & Sahrawat, K.L. 2005. Vermicomposting: recycling waste into valuable organic fertilizer. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development, 99(3-4): 187-204.
  • Nathan, M.V. & Sun, Y. 2006. Methods for plant analysis: A guide for conducting plant analysis in Missouri, available online: http://soilplantlab.missouri.edu/soil/plant/ analysis.rtf. [Accessed July 2018].
  • Nattudurai, G., Ezhil Vendan, S., Ramachandran, P.V. & Lingathurai, S. 2014. Vermicomposting of coirpith with cowdung by Eudrilus eugeniae Kinberg and its efficacy on the growth of Cyamopsis tetragonaloba (L) Taub. Journal of Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 13(1): 23-27.
  • Ndegwa, P.M. & Thompson, S.A. 2001. Integrating composting and vermicomposting in the treatment and bioconversion of biosolids. Bioresource Technology, 76(2): 107-112.
  • Ochoa de Alda, J.A.G. 2008. Feasibility of recycling pulp and paper mill sludge in the paper and board industries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52: 965-972.
  • Okada, K., Yamamoto, N., Kameshima, Y. & Yasumori, A. 2003. Porous properties of activated carbons from waste newspaper prepared by chemical and physical activation. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 262: 179-193.
  • Padmavathiamma, P.K., Li, L.Y. & Kumari, U.R. 2008. An experimental study of vermin-biowaste composting for agricultural soil improvement. Bioresource Technology, 99(6): 1672-1681.
  • Piya, S. Shrestha, I, Gouchan, D.P. & Lamichhane, J. 2018. Vermicomposting in organic agriculture: influence on the soil nutrients and plant growth. International Journal of Research, 5(20): 1055-1063.
  • Reinecke, A.J., Viljoen, S.A. & Saayman, R.J. 1992. The suitability of Eudrilus eugeniae, Perionyx excavatus and Eisenia fetida (Oligochaeta) for vermicomposting in Southern Africa in terms of their temperature requirements. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 24(12): 1295- 1307.
  • Rini, J., Deepthi, M.P., Saminathan, K. Narendhirakannan, R.T, Karmegam, N. & Kathireswari P. 2020. Nutrient recovery and vermicompost production from livestock solid wastes with epigeic earthworms. Bioresource Technology, 313: 123690.
  • Roshan Singh, W. & Kalamdhad, A.S. 2016. Transformation of nutrients and heavy metals during vermicomposting of the invasive green weed Salvinia natans using Eisenia fetidaInternational Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 5(3): 205-220.
  • Rumpel, C., Ngo, P.T., Doan, T.T. & Jouquet, P. 2013. The effect of earthworms on carbon storage and soil organic matter composition in tropical soil amended with compost and vermicompost. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 50: 214-230. Sathe, T.V. 2004. Vermiculture and Organic Farming. New Delhi: Daya Publishing House.Schumacher, B.A. 2002. Methods for the Determination of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) in Soils and Sediments. Ecological Risk Assessment Support Center, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  • Sehar, T., Sheikh, G.G., Zargar, M.Y. & Baba, Z.A. 2016. Identification and screening of earthworm species from various temperate areas in Kashmir Valley for vermicomposting. Advances in Recycling & Waste Management. 1: 102.
  • Serrano, A., Espinach, F.X., Tresserras, J., Rey, R.D., Pellicer, N. & Mutje, P. 2014. Macro and micromechanics analysis of short fiber composites stiffness: The case of old newspaper fiberspolypropylene composites. Materials and Design, 55: 319-324.
  • Singh, R.P., Singh, P., Araujo, A.S.F., Ibrahim, M.H. & Sulaiman, O. 2011. Management of urban solid waste: Vermicomposting a sustainable option. Resource, Conservation and Recycling55(7): 719-729.
  • Sutcu, M. & Akkurt, S. 2009. The use of recycled paper processing residues in making porous brick with reduced thermal conductivity. Ceramics International, 35(7): 2625-2631.
  • Tejada, M., Garcia-Martinez, A.M. & Parrado, J. 2009. Effects of a vermicompost composted with beet vinasse on soil properties, soil losses and soil restoration. Catena, 77(3): 238-247.
  • Twana, T.A. & Fauziah, S.H. 2012. Vermicomposting of two types of coconut wastes employing Eudrilus eugeniae: A comparative study. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 1(7): 1 -6.
  • Wang, H-Q., Zhao, Q., Zeng, D-H., Hu, Y-L., & Yu, Z-Y. 2015. Remediation of a magnesiumcontaminated soil by chemical amendments and leaching. Land Degradation & Development26(6): 613-619.
  • Wani, K.A., Mamta, K. & Rao, R.J. 2013. Bioconversion of garden waste, kitchen waste and cow dung into value added products by using earthworm Eisenia fetida. Saudi Journal of Biological
    Sciences, 20(2): 149-154.
  • Ward, P.L., Wohlt, J.E., Zajac, P.K. & Cooper, K.R. 2014. Chemical and physical properties of processed newspaper compared to wheat straw and wood shavings as animal bedding. Journal of Dairy Science, 83(2): 359-367.
  • Waste Management World. 2013. Paper Recycling: Nurturing Success, available online: https://waste-management-world.com/a/paper-recycling-nurturing-success [Accessed on February 2018].
  • Yang, J., Lv, B., Zhang, J. & Xing, M. 2014. Insight into the roles of earthworm in vermicomposting of sewage sludge by determining the water-extracts through chemical and spectroscopic methods. Bioresource Technology, 154: 94-100.
  • Zucco, M.A., Alan Walters. S., Ahe-Kong, C. & Klubek, B.P. 2015. Effect of soil type and vermicompost applications on tomato growth. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 4: 135-141.