Andy R. Mojiol
Faculty of Science and Natural Resources,
Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah Malaysia.
Email : email@example.com
ABSTRACT Kota Kinabalu City has several urban parks, which has become the centre of urban green space. However the function of the urban park is still not fully recognized. In addition, the enlightenment concept of urban forestry is still unclear in view of the public. This study aims to provide an assessment of the functions of each park in the city of Kota Kinabalu via public perception. Furthermore, it also aims to identify on public awareness about urban forestry concept. There are eight parks that were selected as the location of the study. The Parks comprise ofpublic and pocket parks that are maintained solely by the Kota Kinabalu City Hall. The sampling method used in this study is convenience sampling with questionnaires involving 160 respondents, of whom the target group are the park visitors. The results of the study show a total of 153 (95.6%) respondents agreed that each park has distinct and separated functions. It also shows that urban parks such as Prince Philip Public Park, Teluk Likas Park, Tun Fuad Stephen Public Park, and Ujana Rimba Public Park have recreation as the main function, meanwhile Tugu Petagas Public Park, Kampung Air Pocket Park, and Lintasan Deasoka Pocket Park have aesthetic as the main function, whilst the Signal Hill Park is found to serve as soil erosion control. In addition, a total of 123 (76.9%) of respondents understood the concept of urban forestry as planning and management of trees in urban area. As a conclusion, recreation and aesthetic are the main functions for all of the selected urban parks in the city of Kota Kinabalu city. Besides that, it is found that most of the public are aware of the existence ofurban forest concept in the city of Kota Kinabalu.
KEYWORDS. Public awareness, urban forest park, urban forest, and Kota Kinabalu, Sabah
- Adi Rahman (2002). Kesedaran Penduduk Kota Kinabalu Terhadap Konsep Bandaraya Taman Tropika. Tidak diterbitkan. Universiti Malaysia Sabah.
- Carter, E. J. (1993). The potential of urban forestry in developing countries: a concept paper.
- FAO Gilman, E.F. (1997). Trees for Urban and Suburban Landscapes. Delmer Publisher, United State of America.
- Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U.K. (2010). The Relation between Perceived Sensory Dimensions of Urban Green Space and Stress Restoration. Landscape and UrbanPlanning 94, pp. 57-64.
- JPBD. (1995). Garis Panduan Landskap Negara. Jabatan Perancangan Bandar dan Desa Semananjung Malaysia, Kementerian Perumahan dan Kerajaan Tempatan. Malaysia
- Kearney, A.R., Bradley, G.A., Petrich, C.H., Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., & SimpsonColebank,D. (2008). Public Perception as Support for Scenic Quality Regulation in a Nationaly Treasured Landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 87, pp. 117-128.
- Miller R. W. (2007). Urban Forestry: Planning and Managing Urban Greenspaces 2nd Edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey USA.
- Mojiol, A.R., & Maznah Mahali.(2000). Penyelenggaraan Pokok-pokok Bandar. Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu.
- Schipperijn, J.J. (2010). Use of Urban Green Space. Forest & Landscape Research. Skov & Landskab, Københavns Universitet.
- Vince, S.W., Duryea, M.L., Macie,E.A., & Hermansen,L.A. (2005). Forest at The Wildland-Urban Interface: Conservation and Management. CRC Press LLC, United State of America.