CLASSIFICATION AND QUANTIFICATION OF MARINE DEBRIS AT TELUK LIKAS, SABAH

Farrah Anis Fazliatul Adnan*, Rudy Kilip, Dezvieo Keniin & Carolyn Payus

Faculty of Science and Natural Resources, Universiti Malaysia Sabah,
88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.
Email: f_anis@ums.edu.my

ABSTRACT.Marine debris is a well-known issue faced by the public today and the problem is becoming serious day by day. In this study, quantification and classification of marine debris for plastic, fabric, paper, metal, glass and rubber was conducted to evaluate the marine littering of contamination level at Likas Bay. This study also aims to identify the sources of the marine debris whether it was from the land or was brought in from the sea. By selecting 10m x 10m transects randomly, the marine litters that were collected along the bay were rinsed, dried, weighted and classified according to categories. Total of 3396 items/100m2 of marine debris with the weight of 14499.36g/100m2 were collected throughout the study. From the result, it shows that plastic dominated the overall numbers and weight percentage of marine debris with 94.38% in numbers and 65.29% in weight. The study also indicates that the occurrence of marine debris at Likas Bay was not mainly caused from recreational activities at the area, but was brought in from the sea. This may due to the physical condition and the bay position which has the tendency to trap the marine debris from the sea. Therefore, further investigation should be undergoing to overcome and reduce the impact to the marine debris.

KEYWORDS: Marine debris, Littering, Transects, Bay

REFERENCES

  • Abu-Hilal, A.H. & Al-Najjar, T. 2004. Litter pollution on the Jordanian shores of the Gulf of Aqaba (Red Sea). Marine environmental research, 58(1):39–63.
  • Beach, C., Thornton, L. & Jackson, N.L. 1998. Spatial and Temporal Variations in Debris Accumulation and Composition on an Estuarine Shoreline, Cliffwood Beach, New Jersey, USA. Marine Pollution Bulletin 36(9), 705 – 711.
    Bravo, M., Gallardo, A., Luna-Jorquera, G.,Núñez, P., Vásquez, N., & Thiel, M. 2009. Anthropogenic debris on beaches in the SE Pacific (Chile): results from a national survey supported by volunteers. Marine pollution bulletin, 58(11):1718–26.
  • Claereboudt, M.R. 2004. Shore litter along sandy beaches of the Gulf of Oman. Marine pollution bulletin, 49(9-10):770–777. Derraik, J.G.B. 2002. The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review. Marine pollution bulletin, 44(9):842–52.
  • Dixon, T.R. & Dixon, T.J.1981. Marine litter surveillance. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 12:289–295.
  • Gudger, E. W. & Hoffman, W. H. 1931 . A shark encircled with a rubber automobile tire. Scientific Monthly, 33:275–277.
  • Hidalgo-Ruz, V. & Thiel, M. 2013. Distribution and abundance of small plastic debris on beaches in the SE Pacific (Chile): a study supported by a citizen science project. Marine environmental research, 87-88:12–8.
  • Jayasiri, H.B., Purushothaman, C.S. & Vennila, A. 2013. Quantitative analysis of plastic debris on recreational beaches in Mumbai, India. Marine pollution bulletin.(In press) McIlgorm, A., Campbell, H.F. & Rule, M.J. 2011. The economic cost and control of marine debris damage in the Asia-Pacific region. Ocean & Coastal Management, 54(9):643–651.
  • Moore, E., Lyday, S. , Roletto, J., Litle, K., Parrish, J.K., Nevins, H., Harvey, J., Mortenson, J., Greig, D., Piazza, M., Hermanceh, A., Lee, D., Adams, D., Allen, S. & Kell, S. 2009. Entanglements of marine mammals and seabirds in central California and the north-west coast of the United States 2001 -2005. Marine pollution bulletin, 58(7):1045–51.
  • Classification and Quantification of Marine Debris at Teluk Likas, Sabah Moore, S.L. & Allen, M.J. 2000. Distribution of Anthropogenic and Natural Debris on the Mainland Shelf of the Southern California Bight. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40(1):83–88.
  • Moore, S.L., Gregorio, D., Carreon, M., Weisberg, S.B. & Leecaster, M.K. 2001. Composition and distribution of beach debris in Orange County, California. Marine pollution
    bulletin, 42(3):241 –5 Rees, G. & Pond, K. 1995. Marine litter monitoring programmes—A review of methods with special reference to national surveys. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 30(2):103–108.
  • Rosevelt, C.,Huertos, M.L., Garza, C. & Nevins, H.M. 2013. Marine debris in central California: quantifying type and abundance of beach litter in Monterey Bay, CA. Marine pollution bulletin, 71(1-2):299–306.
  • Slavin, C., Grage, A. & Campbell, M.L. 2012. Linking social drivers of marine debris with actual marine debris on beaches. Marine pollution bulletin, 64(8):1580–1588.
  • Somerville, S.E., Miller, K.L. & Mair, J.M. 2003. Assessment of the aesthetic quality of a selection of beaches in the Firth of Forth, Scotland. Marine pollution bulletin, 46(9):1184–90.
  • Topçu, E.N., Tonay, A.M., Dede, A., Öztürk, A.A. & Öztürk, B. 2013. Origin and abundance of marine litter along sandy beaches of the Turkish Western Black Sea Coast. Marine environmental research, 85:21–8.
  • Van Cauwenberghe, L.,Claessens, M., Vandegehuchte, M.B., Mees, J. & Janssen, C.R. 2013. Assessment of marine debris on the Belgian Continental Shelf. Marine pollution bulletin, 73(1):161 –9.
  • Zhou, P., Huang, C., Fang, H., Cai, W., Li, D., Li, X. & Yu, H. 2011. The abundance, composition and sources of marine debris in coastal seawaters or beaches around the northern South China Sea (China). Marine pollution bulletin, 62(9):1998–2007.

Download Full Paper Here (Right-Click and Save As.. )